Vibhuti Narain Rai

Birth November 28, 1951 (age 60) Azamgarh , Uttar Pradesh , India
Nationality Indian
Nationality Indian
Education MA (English) , BA (Hons)
Styles Novelist , editor , administrator , social worker
Vibhuti Narain Rai (Assamese: বিভূতি নাৰায়ণ ৰায়, English: Vibhuti Narain Rai) (28 नवम्बर, 1951) Azamgarh (Uttar Pradesh) Born | Vibhuti Narain Rai, a 1975 batch UP cadre IPS Officer. President's Award for Distinguished Service and Police medals awarded Mr. Roy with a sensitive police officer - known as a storyteller are of top quality. Presents novel "transferred" to the International Indu Sharma Katha Samman received. His novel "The city curfew" Hindi than English, Assamese, Punjabi, Urdu, Bangla, Marathi, etc. has to be translated. One of his other novel "the story of democracy" to have received the honor of the Uttar Pradesh Hindi Sansthan. Besides his satirical novels - Collection "is a student - the leader of the diary" is also very popular. You are currently Chancellor of Mahatma Gandhi International Hindi University.

From the author
"The city curfew" was like going through a tragedy for me to write. In those days I was appointed in New Delhi and the old part of town was hit by riots. Every second third year, kick it to me was quite different from the riots. The violence and a lot of evil out of newspaper pages to be part of the world was my experience - an experience not to pursue the next several years, leaving me was like a nightmare. I felt freedom from the nightmare is only one way to put these experiences to write. I have consistently supported me in writing between the language - would leave in the middle. English is an old saying, "Language Is That a poor substitute for. This novel type it very much missed दंगों में मानवीय त्रासदी के जितने शेड्स जितने संघनित रूप मेरे अनुभव संसार में जुड़े उन सबको लिख पाना न संभव था और न ही इस छोटे से उपन्यास को खत्म करने के बाद मुझे लगा कि मैं उस तरह से लिख पाया जिस तरह से उपन्यास के पात्रों और events was my face. It is a confession and I feel no shame over it.
"Curfew in the city" after the publication received mixed responses. Prejudiced by the pioneers of Hindutva novel anti-Hindu and declared to stop the demand and burnt copies of the novel in many places. In contrast, more than fifty Urdu newspapers and magazines "curfew in the city of" Urdu translation published in whole or in part. Pakistan's "Itrka" and "Today" prestigious literary journals such as the novel also featured in the points. Badly divided the society it was not so unusual.
Communal riots in India, the country's two major communities - Hindus and Muslims - their prejudice. On the assumption that an average Hindu riots start rioting Muslims and Hindus in riots that killed large numbers. Why so much that the Muslims killed Hindus by nature cruel, violent and are Dharmonmadi. On the contrary, he believes that the Hindu scrupulous, are liberal and tolerant.
According to data available in the riots since independence more than 70% of the victims are Muslim. Ranchi - Hatia (1967), Ahmedabad (1969), Bhiwandi (1970), Jalgaon (1970) and Mumbai (1992-93) or Ram Janmabhoomi Babri Masjid dispute in connection with the riots, the figure - has gone up 90% is. The same property is also in the cases. Not only Muslims but also those killed in the riots more than the property damage occurred. Police in riot breaks at the same havoc. उन दंगों में भी जिनमें मुसलमान 70-80 प्रतिशत से अधिक मरे थे पुलिस ने जिन लोगों को गिरफ्तार किया उनमें 70-80 प्रतिशत से अधिक मुसलमान थे, उन्हीं के घरों की तलाशियाँ ली गईं, उन्हीं की औरतें बेइज्जत हुईं और उन्हीं के मोहल्लों में सख्ती With the curfew was imposed.
Looking for the causes of this peculiar situation is not very difficult. So an average Hindu is not easy to believe the official statistics. Accuracy of data raises a question mark over the government despite the fact that no government in the world will not be well known that such statistics would prove that life in the minority here - material is not protected.
Now we come to the bias that is what kick-start? The majority of Hindus believe that riots are usually started by Muslims. A Hindu bureaucrats, academics, journalists, jurists or policemen in mind that it is no doubt who has kick-start? Since Muslims are violent by nature, so it is very natural that kick-starts the same. Also refers to the fact that riots occur in those areas where Muslims are in majority.
During my fellowship I "kick-start which makes it" the first "who dies in riots" of the investigation. As a Hindu I had to go through the painful facts. I believe that the riots in the Hindu mind, generous, tolerant and non-violent and brutal loss of Hindus than the Muslims would be violent. The proportion lost their property and the fact there is no secret. Especially Muslims and the Urdu press will know that they will be killed when riot. The police will arrest them, their homes will have the Tlashiaँ. Moreover, the full brunt of the riots will break on them. Why they would like to kick-start? The two may be due either to a community as they are stupid or he may have intended to commit suicide en masse.
Who decided to kick-start is usually done by the fact that at the moment of excitement, who threw the first stone. The decision may be wrong. The stress required for communal violence broke out in the form of a pyramid is build. True even before the riots began, several months before the rumors, accusations and negative publicity mill is run. Stress gradually increases and eventually becomes a departure point when only a stone or a provocative slogan is able to kick-start. The departure point of the fact that there is no sense of who threw the first stone!
Myth of the introduction of anti-Muslim violence to better understand an example will be enough. In 1970, massive riots in Bhiwandi. On May 7, riot began when out on the birth anniversary of Shivaji were protests by Muslims on the march. At first glance, seems obvious cause of the riots began. Can easily be said that the Muslims started rioting. But go to the bottom of the events will be clear that the case is not so easy. The past several months, the Hindutva forces were involved in the inflammatory and provocative actions. Justice Madan Commission has outlined in detail on these activities. Procession on the road on both sides of the argument. Muslims wanted to march Jaaa not be that way where they had to mosques. Hindu processions stuck to the same way. Meanwhile, triggered protests from Muslims and kick-started. When we first decided to start riots and protests have to take into account developments.
First keep in mind the fact that Muslims would know that they Pitenge riot. Why again and again they throw the first stone? Poverty, lack of education and the fear of Muslims led by opportunistic builds.
ऊपर मैंने जानबूझकर बहुसंख्यक समुदाय के मनोविज्ञान की बात की है क्योंकि मेरा मानना है कि बिना इसे बदले हम देश में सांप्रदायिक दंगे नहीं रोक सकते। बहुसंख्यक समुदाय के समझदार लोगों को यह मानना ही पड़ेगा कि उनकी धार्मिक बर्बरता के शिकार अल्पसंख्यक समुदायों के लोग ही रहे हैं और इस देश की धरती तथा संसाधनों पर जितना उनका अधिकार है उतना ही अल्पसंख्यक समुदायों का भी है। इसके साथ ही हमें यह भी मानना होगा कि सांप्रदायिक दंगों के दौरान पुलिस और फौज का काम देश के सभी नागरिकों की हिफाजत करना है, हिंदुत्व के औजार की तरह काम करना नहीं।
I think with violence - Indian Muslims also have to think on other major issues. First of all it must be recognized that the two nations was based on the principle of division of the country was utterly wrong. Neither nations have been constructed on the basis of religion or Hindus and Muslims are two different nations. India's Hindus and Muslims whose common social, economic, linguistic background, are much closer to each other than those whose cultures are different but just like religion.
There's no time to get involved in the question, Who made the division of the country. Partition was a big mistake and we have suffered a major brunt. The time has come when the people of the subcontinent to sit and look closely at the questions.
At the same time - with the Muslims should take cognizance of the psychology which Nijamen - Mustafa or Sharia law-based society, the discussion continues. Should be accepted as a secular faith. Not as an immediate policy. In a democracy, secularism, the battle can be fought together in the fields but not Bँtkr.
- Vibhuti Narain Rai, New Delhi August 15, 2002